The new-new-new economy

February 25th, 2010 by aLeX in: theory

Today I was thinking about the concept of a basic income, one of many proposition to get out of the current economic situation.

In a few words, basic income means each citizen gets a basic salary just because he is a citizen, without having to work. This basic salary could be 500/600 Euro per month. Now, the concept is difficult to grasp for many people, mainly because they will generally feel that it’s unfair and detrimental to give money “for free”. And they might be right, for what I know.

So, as I was saying, today I was thinking about the basic income, and how it should be linked to a minimum amount of work (let’s say, 16 hours per week).

Let me explain.

Imagine you can get 600 Euro per month if you work 16 hours. You can do any work. You can make up your job (web-designer, musician) or you could work for a factory (16 hours per week is ok), a call center, or even volunteer for the Red Cross or anything else. All you have to do is to get yourself busy somehow. Of course if you work more than 16 hours, you will get paid accordingly.

This is the skeleton of my idea. Its realization is not very easy, because a system must be put in place in order to avoid scams. Perhaps a feedback system a-la eBay might work, along with a microchipped-card similar to the supermarket fidelity cards.

I think that the economic boost something like this would have (imagine how creativity would explode) could pay back the money the governement needs to spend to get the program started.

We have to think about this.

The Imaginary Part of Action

February 4th, 2010 by aLeX in: theory

A few days ago an interesting podcast was released on Red Ice Creations radio; it featured Holger Bech Nielsen, a physicist in the Niels-Bohr Institute in Denmark, talking mainly about the Large Hedron Collider and Nielsen’s theory about the “bad luck” which seems to have hit the experiment.

It’s an interesting talk, although a bit technical, so I recommend it to ya.

During the talk, Dr. Nielsen talks about the concept of “Imaginary Part of Action”. The action is the “history” of a certain system. This history has caused the state the system is in at the moment, and we call it action.

Now, according to Nielsen, we can say that at the moment of the creation, there must have been some kind of action (imaginary action), and he goes on by saying that for “mathematical” reasons this action must have been the smallest possible, and “negative”. He also states that “the system that wins is the one with the smallest amount of imagination”.

Now, I have a feeling this might tie up in some way with Terence McKenna’s timewave theory. I just don’t know how yet.

What Nielsen’s theory implies is that we are not going to have UFOs landing, our moms shapeshifting before our very eyes, Maytreias appearing in the sky, and so on. It implies change has to be subtle, natural, harmonius, non-traumatic.

Perhaps change within ourselves and change on the outside are connected in some kind of inverse relation. The more dramatically we change within ourselves, the more subtle yet powerful the change will be in the outside world.

Crop Circles…

December 12th, 2009 by aLeX in: theory

I don’t know what your stance is on the crop circles affaire. Some say they are alien made, some say they are natural occurrences, some say they are man-made.

A while ago it occurred to me that it is highly unlikely they are man-made, for a few simple reasons…

According to cropcirleconnector.com during 2009 we had 73 crop circles in UK alone (mostly in Wiltshire) and 46 in the rest of the world (7 in Italy, this one being especially beautiful). Most of these crops are really beatiful works of mathematical art.
If we think or a moment that YES, they are all man-made, this would mean that:

1. We need at least a designer with great visionary skills capable of coming up with around a 100 designs per year. A great artist capable not only of producing aesthetically pleasing compositions but also to often integrate mathematics  in these designs.

2. We need a crew of at least 6-8 people (according to videos of manmade crops I’ve seen on the internet) equipped with appropriate tools. This crew would be most probably based in Wiltshire, I guess.

3. These people need a good cash flow to keep going with their creations during 4 months in a row. Cash is needed to pay for cars, fuel, airplane tickets for when cropping abroad, tools, food, sleeping.

4. Hence, cropmakers would need a rather good occult financial support.

5. It would be highly probable that there is more than one cropmakers crew to keep up with the amount of work done, meaning that we need a couple or maybe four designers, and 20-30 more people.

Is this possible? I don’t know, it might be, but what are the chances? To me, it sounds much more likely that crop circles are natural, caused by something we do not understand yet.

My take on 2012

October 19th, 2009 by aLeX in: theory

I was around Milano with my bicycle at 3.00 AM when the following occurred to me.

IF Terence McKenna was right, we are experiencing an increase of novelty (which is, the amount of stuff happening in my/your/our life), to culminate in 2012.

In my own experience, which might be different from yours, I am actually perceiving an increase in the amount of “stuff” going on within me. I never have a boring moment. I always feel busy even tho I’m not working at the moment.

So, if my own experience is agreeing with McKenna’s ideas (and with the idea of cycles in the Mayan calendar, and the idea of technological singularity in some way) I then assume it has some sort of truth.

This said, what does it mean that novelty is increasing?
It means that the amount of things happening in a second is increasing.
Time is not speeding up, we are.

As McKenna used to say, it is as if there is an attractor at the end of time (he called it, eschaton).

This attractor does not accelerate time itself, it rather does increase the frequency of the oscillation in our lives.

This can only mean we are approching everlasting life. And it is not going to be through a superhuman ability to live on through the ages. It is going to be through a breakthrough on the inside. Time is not an issue anymore.

Some good links:

Here is a Terence McKenna website

here, a timewave calculator (really cool)

Dedicated to Terence – We love you

Aliens in the sky with diamonds

July 26th, 2009 by aLeX in: theory

I’m posting this from my hometown Milano, where it seems many UFO sightings have taken place… here’s a few videos.

Now, I know it’s easy to faKe a small ufo in the sky using computers. What I find “real” in this videos is rather the audio. You can hear people genuinely amazed, talking to each other and so on. This feels real (especially if you understand what they say).

Enjoy.

PS: I can add my own cents to this saying that myself I have witnessed a white oval shape traversing the sky one night a few months ago in Ireland. Don’t know what it was, it was not a plane I tell you.

ALieN DrEamTiM3 – terence mckenna

July 9th, 2009 by aLeX in: theory, vision

McKenna is always good.

McKenna on Ufos

McKenna, Psychedelics, Aliens

Gimme some Chew-Z

July 8th, 2009 by aLeX in: theory
Palmer Eldritch

Palmer Eldritch

Today I feel like I might use some Chew-Z. I’d love to be teleported in a dimension where I can meet Palmer Eldritch and ask him about past and future and all things lost and those yet to be found. What would he tell me? He might say, “Try harder. Maybe not today, not tomorrow, but in 100 years or a in a thousand lives you might find what you are looking for. And it will be hard, because you cannot put into words that Transcendental Object (at the end of time?) you desperately want. How are you going to know you’ve found it if you don’t know how it looks like.”

Palmer you’re clever, man. When was it that you became so… so… so Palmer Eldritch? Was it in the Proxy Star System? Have you always been like that? It doesn’t matter, really. Knowing the exact circumstances is only going to steal processing power from our brains.

We should concentrate on the matter that matters. How to find THAT which we look for, how to recognize it. We’ve been given eyes and ears and hands and so we suppose we need to use them. Which is right. At the same time we probably need NOT to use them if we are to find the Object. Why is these eXistenZ always such a paradox? How am I supposed to feel what I can’t really feel. Why are we burdened with this damn duality?

What do you say Palmer?

“I think you know the Object, you know its non-shape. I think  you know very well that it’s here, right beside you. And the fun part, the comedy in all of this, is that you CAN NOT see it. Ain’t that funny? Ain’t that a nice prank, the ultimate practical joke? It makes me giggle. ”

Yes Palmer, you giggle, you laugh, you do what you do, I can see your teeth o’ steel, your upgraded all-seeying eyes-non-eyes, your artificial arm. I can see you don’t belong here nor there. Did you grasp it all? Did you get to a final understanding?Was it worth it?

“I am what I am, I do what I do, noone will ever know more than he’s supposed to.”

Well. Thanks Palmer.

Inner/Outer

June 29th, 2009 by aLeX in: theory

‘Outer space, inner space… Inner space the only real space’

Sai Baba knows.

New Swirled Order

June 27th, 2009 by aLeX in: theory, vision

A beautiful documentary about crop circles has been released by Nuoviso.

And the best thing is, you can watch it for free, zero, nada! Then if you want you can buy the dvd version with tons of additional material… here it is anyway!

The Obama Deception?!? (HQ video)

April 7th, 2009 by aLeX in: theory, vision